How to know if you're selfish (and whether or not that's bad) - Mark Hopwood

TED-Ed www.youtube.com

Brief Summary

This video explores the philosophical question of whether humans are inherently selfish. It examines the concept of psychological egoism, the views of philosophers like Kant and Rousseau on self-love, and Murdoch's idea that love and attention are the solutions to overcoming selfishness by truly seeing others.

  • Psychological egoism suggests all actions are motivated by self-interest.
  • Philosophers like Kant acknowledge the difficulty in proving actions are not driven by "a secret impulse of self-love."
  • Murdoch argues that overcoming selfishness involves cultivating attention to see others and the world as they truly are.

The Cupcake Dilemma: Are Humans Inherently Selfish?

The video starts with a scenario at a party, posing the question of whether to take the last cupcake, and introduces the philosophical debate of whether humans are inherently selfish. It highlights the perspectives of philosophers like John Stuart Mill, Aristotle, and Thomas Hobbes, who offer differing views on morality and self-interest. The central question explored is whether human actions are fundamentally driven by selfishness.

Psychological Egoism and the Debate Among Philosophers

The video introduces psychological egoism, the idea that all human actions are motivated by self-interest, noting that few philosophers fully endorse this view due to evidence of self-sacrifice. It mentions studies showing that even young children exhibit helpful behaviour without personal gain. Immanuel Kant's perspective is presented, suggesting that even seemingly altruistic acts may be motivated by hidden self-interest.

Two Kinds of Self-Love

The video explores different perspectives on self-love, contrasting Rousseau's "Amour de soi" (basic self-preservation) with "amour propre" (desire for recognition and social status), which he sees as a source of inequality. Aristotle's view is also presented, arguing that humans flourish by seeking the good of both themselves and others, suggesting true self-love involves working against selfish tendencies.

Overcoming Selfishness Through Moral Duty, Emotions and Love

The video discusses how to overcome selfishness, presenting Kant's argument that moral duty helps transcend self-interest, and Rousseau and Adam Smith's view that emotions like pity and sympathy enable consideration of others' needs. It introduces Iris Murdoch's belief that love is the true solution to selfishness, defining it as the difficult realisation that something other than oneself is real.

Murdoch's Perspective: Love and Attention

The video explains Murdoch's concept of selfishness as seeing oneself as the star and others as secondary. It uses the example of a discontented mother-in-law to illustrate how selfishness reduces others to caricatures based on one's own jealousy and insecurity. Murdoch suggests that with conscious effort, one can learn to see others as they truly are.

Cultivating Attention to See the World as It Truly Is

The video elaborates on Murdoch's idea of love as recognising the reality of things outside oneself and introduces the concept of cultivating attention, inspired by Buddhist meditation. It suggests engaging in activities like art, language learning, or observing nature to direct attention beyond the self. The video concludes that by practicing attention, we can learn to see the world and others as they truly are, overcoming our inherent selfishness.

Summarize any YouTube video in seconds

Get summaries like this one for any video, in your language, with the free Summ app.

Download on the App Store
Get it on Google Play

Transcript

YouTube Transcript Generator

0:07 In the kitchen at a friend's party, you're in the midst of a profound moral conundrum. Famous philosophers whisper advice in your ear. Utilitarian John Stuart Mill tells you that one should always strive to bring about the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Aristotle reminds you of the importance of the virtues of generosity and justice. But Thomas Hobbes points out that "of all voluntary acts, the object is to every man his own good." In other words, human beings are inherently selfish anyway. So why shouldn't you take the last cupcake for yourself?

0:55 This is actually one of philosophy's oldest questions. Not your cupcake dilemma— the question of whether or not human beings are inherently selfish. The idea that humans only act out of self-interest is known as psychological egoism, and there aren't many philosophers who endorse this extreme stance. There's simply too much evidence of humans sacrificing their self-interest, and sometimes their very lives, for the sake of others. And studies by psychologists have shown that even very young children demonstrate helpful behavior despite there being nothing in it for themselves. However, the idea that all humans have a deep selfish streak

1:42 is something many more philosophers would agree with. German philosopher Immanuel Kant noted that while we often seem to act for the sake of others, it's impossible to be sure we're not truly motivated by "a secret impulse of self-love." For example, maybe when people make large donations to charity, they're actually more interested in looking good or benefiting from tax breaks than helping others. It's worth noting that not all philosophers think self-love is always a bad thing. French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau identified two kinds of self-love. He believed "Amour de soi," our basic need for self-preservation,

2:30 is natural and essential. But he identified "amour propre," our toxic desire for recognition and social status, as the cause of many unjust disparities. In a similar vein, Aristotle argued that humans are social beings who can only flourish when we seek the good of others as well as ourselves. By this logic, true self-love requires us to work against our selfish tendencies. For many philosophers, this is where the real problem lies— how do we overcome our selfishness? Some, like Kant, have argued that our sense of moral duty is what helps us rise above our narrow self-interest.

3:18 Others, like Rousseau and Adam Smith, contend that emotions like pity and sympathy are what allow us to consider the needs of others. But 20th century philosopher-novelist Iris Murdoch believed the only true solution to human selfishness was love. Or at least, a certain kind of love. For Murdoch, selfishness isn't about trivial things like taking the last cupcake. It's about seeing the world in a way that casts yourself as a star, and everyone else as secondary characters. To explain this, Murdoch tells the story of a discontented mother-in-law. While the mother is always polite,

4:04 she secretly feels her son made a mistake marrying his "vulgar" and "tiresomely juvenile" wife. To Murdoch, this mother is the picture of selfishness. By centering her own jealousy and insecurity, she's reducing the nuanced reality of her daughter-in-law to a caricature. But with some conscious effort, Murdoch believes the mother can learn to see her daughter in law as she truly is— not vulgar or juvenile, but refreshingly straightforward and delightfully youthful. To be clear, this doesn't mean the mother should simply don rose-colored glasses. Love, as Murdoch defines it, is "the extremely difficult realization

4:54 that something other than oneself is real." As challenging as this might be, Murdoch believes we can all reach this realization by cultivating what she calls attention. Partially inspired by Buddhist meditation, this practice could include engaging with art, learning foreign languages, or simply taking the time to observe the natural environment. What's important for Murdoch is that the behavior helps direct your attention beyond the self. Because only by practicing our ability to attend to the world around us can we learn to see it as it truly is.

Share

YouTube Video Summaries