Brief Summary
Candace Owens discusses Turning Point USA's (TPUSA) handling of a debate invitation, the ongoing investigation into Charlie Kirk's assassination, and reactions to her claim about a French assassination attempt. She critiques TPUSA's transparency and sincerity, questions the motives behind their actions, and shares updates on the Egyptian plane investigation, including a connection to a person named Wedi Machmood. Owens also addresses Tim Pool's criticism of her focus on Kirk's assassination and encourages her audience to seek truth and authenticity.
- TPUSA's debate invitation and perceived lack of sincerity.
- Investigation into Charlie Kirk's assassination and the involvement of Egyptian planes.
- Reactions to Candace's claim about a French assassination attempt.
- Call for authenticity and truth in media and politics.
Start
Candace Owens starts by outlining the topics she will cover, including Turning Point USA's (TPUSA) debate invitation, updates on the Egyptian planes, and the PR response to her assassination attempt claim. She expresses her frustration with TPUSA's lack of direct communication and questions their motives.
TPUSA's in person debate demand
Owens questions the internal dynamics of Turning Point USA, particularly regarding decision-making and PR strategies. She criticizes TPUSA's late-night tweet issuing an ultimatum for a debate, highlighting the lack of prior coordination. She reveals that Cam Higgby, a reporter who questioned the Pentagon about the alleged French assassination attempt on her life, is on TPUSA's payroll. Owens interprets TPUSA's actions as insincere and indicative of a cover-up, especially given their reluctance to engage in a genuine discussion about Charlie Kirk's assassination. She offers to join the debate virtually, emphasizing the technological feasibility, but TPUSA insists on an in-person appearance in Phoenix on December 15th.
Egyptian plane updates
Owens provides an update on the Egyptian planes involved in the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation. She identifies a person named Wedi Machmood, who flew to Provo on May 27th aboard an Egyptian military plane with tail number SUBTU, which didn't transpond. This same individual was also connected to the day of Charlie's assassination. She notes that SUBTU was previously used by the Egyptian president, raising questions about Wedi Machmood's identity and purpose. Owens stresses the importance of investigating these connections to uncover the truth behind Kirk's assassination.
The PR move to laugh at my assassination attempt
Owens critiques the PR strategy of dismissing her claim about a French assassination attempt as a joke. She points out that neither the White House, the Elise Palace, nor the Pentagon has formally denied the claim. She calls out Ben Shapiro and others for mocking the situation and suggests that this is an attempt to manipulate public opinion. Owens also references Frank Turk's defense of Blake Nef, where he quoted Charlie Kirk as calling Nef "the smartest man I know". She dismisses this as emotionally manipulative and inauthentic, questioning why TPUSA is not addressing Kirk's alleged concerns about his safety before his death.
Tim Pool's breakdown
Owens addresses Tim Pool's criticism of her focus on Charlie Kirk's assassination. She counters Pool's argument that her actions are detrimental to political goals by stating that the pursuit of truth is more important than political outcomes. She accuses Pool and others of viewing Kirk as a means to an end and prioritizing political gains over genuine concern for his death.
Comments
Owens engages with comments from her audience, addressing concerns about her safety and the risks associated with her investigations. She encourages her supporters to remain bold and seek the truth, regardless of the dangers. She also discusses the importance of taking control of one's life and education by homeschooling children and avoiding reliance on pharmaceutical companies. Owens reiterates her commitment to uncovering the truth behind Charlie Kirk's assassination and criticizes the corruption and inauthenticity she perceives in Turning Point USA and the broader political landscape.
